Tag Archive | "carcinogens"

Anatomy of an E-Cigarette


Electronic, or e-cigarettes, are battery-operated devices that generally contain cartridges filled with nicotine, flavor and carrier chemicals. The contents of the cartridge are heated to a vapor, which the user inhales.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration decided in April not to challenge a U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that e-cigarettes are not drugs or devices unless marketed as such, but can be regulated as tobacco products. That means the devices aren’t subject to the testing requirements of pharmaceuticals.

The FDA has done no formal, large-scale tests on the products, but did release a statement in 2009 saying it had analyzed the ingredients in a small sample of cartridges from two leading brands.
The analysis detected diethylene glycol in one sample – a chemical used in antifreeze that is considered toxic to humans – and detectable levels of carcinogens in several others.

“Because these products have not been submitted to the FDA for evaluation or approval, at this time the agency has no way of knowing, except for the limited testing it has performed, the levels of nicotine or the amounts or kinds of other chemicals that the various brands of these products deliver to the user,” the statement says.

The Electronic Cigarette Association, a group of private companies involved in the production and sale of the product, disputes the finding, saying in a statement on its website that the FDA’s analysis is “too narrow to reach any valid and reliable conclusions” and ignores efforts by member companies to ensure the products include health warnings and are marketed only as an alternative to smoking by current tobacco users over 18.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, tobacco smoke from regular cigarettes contains more than 7,000 chemicals and chemical compounds, including more than 70 that are known carcinogens.

Posted in Electronic Cigarette InfoComments (0)

Going Smoke Free (Sort Of…)



Sean Morgan, above, exhales a cloud of propylene glycol while using his e-cigarette. The cloud is the same compound found in the vapor of smoke machines. (Mark Ylen/Democrat-Herald)

A Sweet Home, Oregon, man is promoting the use of e-cigarettes as a safer alternative to traditional smoking

SWEET HOME, OREGON — Sean Morgan is very clear: He’s not trying to promote smoking to nonsmokers, or to children, or to anyone else not already legally into the habit.

But for fellow smokers like himself, who enjoy cigarettes but not some of their side effects, the Sweet Home resident suggests giving an e-cigarette a try.

“I don’t want to quit smoking,” said Morgan, 39, who’s gone through about a pack and a half of cigarettes a day since age 18. “I like smoking. But I don’t like smoke.”

About the size of a ballpoint pen, electronic or e-cigarettes are battery-powered vaporizers that turn nicotine into a breathable vapor.

The Electronic Cigarettes Association, a group of product companies, backs the product as “an alternative to a known killer,” a stance the federal Food and Drug Administration doesn’t share. This past April, the FDA announced it intends to treat e-cigarettes the same as traditional cigarettes and other tobacco products.

Morgan doesn’t believe the two should be considered equal, and has asked the Sweet Home School Board not to treat them so.

He’d like the board to allow the use of e-cigs on school property, as long as they aren’t being used during school-related events. He’s thinking specifically of the Oregon Jamboree, the country music festival that takes place on the grounds of Sweet Home High School, where he volunteers each summer.

Morgan’s request comes as several public entities across the U.S. have included e-cigs in their smoking bans, including agencies in Washington state.

At its regular meeting this Wednesday, the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department will consider a revised version of its proposed e-cigarette regulation to allow use in public places where minors are lawfully prohibited. It would also allow “vaping” in places of employment that aren’t public places.
Cigarettes, in Morgan’s view, are harmful because they contain tobacco and emit tobacco smoke, which in turn can cause harm to others. In contrast, the nicotine in e-cigs is drawn directly into one person’s body without the tar, ash or carbon monoxide that comes with tobacco.

The carrier substance in Morgan’s brand of e-cig is propylene glycol, a compound found in fake “smoke” used for concerts and firefighter trainings. “What comes out is basically just fog,” he said.
It’s possible there’s some harm in it, he acknowledges, although studies to date haven’t noted any if the compound is consumed in small amounts. A New Zealand study also found trace amounts of carcinogens from the distillation process.

Morgan was concerned about the health implications at first. After learning about e-cigs roughly two years ago, he researched the products for months, worrying about whether the switch would hurt him.

“Then I started thinking, what’s in a cigarette? Forty to 60 carcinogens?” Morgan laughed, shaking his head. “It’s a no-brainer.”

The jury’s still out on the threat posed by nicotine itself, without tobacco. Some studies have found the chemical itself to be strongly addicting and associate its stimulant properties with hypertension, breathing problems and sleep disorders. According to the Mayo Clinic, the risk of cancer associated with long-term nicotine replacement therapy appears to be minimal, although one study indicated long-term exposure to even low levels of nicotine could lead to increased risk of mouth cancer in certain individuals.

The lack of hard data on the safety of e-cigs for users and bystanders still prompted the same Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department to craft its e-cigarette regulation.

From its press release: “We still believe there is a lack of hard data to assure the public that e-cigarettes are safe for the user and bystanders, but at the same time we acknowledge that there is a similar lack of data that they are in fact harmful.”

For Morgan, switching to e-cigarettes are a calculated risk; one he’s willing to take in the same way as the risks that come with consumption of caffeine.

“That’s kind of like how I view it, drinking coffee or Pepsi,” he said. “And I’m not going to stop eating red meat and eggs. I view this in the same light, I guess.”

In the meantime, he said, he doesn’t feel any of the side effects tobacco smoke produced. He’s stopped coughing. His sense of taste and smell have returned. He can sleep at night and feel energized when he wakes up. His coworkers prefer the scents of the vapor flavors (peach and espresso are among Morgan’s favorites) among to the smell of stale smoke.

He’s even saving money; spending roughly $40 a month on cartridges and replacement parts for the e-cigs compared with the $180 that used to support his habit of four cartons of cigarettes per month. (Most startup kits, according to the Electronic Cigarettes Association, are between $75 and $100.)

Some e-smokers use the devices to try to kick the habit altogether. Morgan isn’t one of those, but noted he might be able to do so more easily if he chooses.

At one point, his “e-juice” consumption dropped to just half a bottle a month, down from two bottles a month, which was roughly the equivalent in nicotine of the pack and a half of cigarettes he had been smoking before picking up the e-cigs. After more than 20 years of being hooked on cigarettes, being able to cut his use by three-quarters was a significant change.

“Now, I can go without smoking most of a day,” he said.

Morgan said he understands the Sweet Home School Board’s questions about the product and some members’ reluctance to seem soft on smoking.

“This is new and scary and like cigarettes,” he said. “My hope is someday this will be completely divorced from the concept of smoking cigarettes.”

Copyright 2011 democratherald.com. Used with permission. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Posted in Electronic Cigarette NewsComments (0)

TV Doctors Say Ecig Is Safer


A recent episode of the popular television series “THE DOCTORS” named the Top 10 Health Trends of 2009, including the revolutionary and still relatively unknown smoking alternative device – the Electronic Cigarette. This is pretty big news and a positive sign for people who ‘vape’ all across the U.S., as mainstream exposure can only help further the success and acceptance of these products.

The doctors on the panel stated that for the millions of people addicted to smoking, there may be some hope in a safer alternative. The ecigarette is a high-tech device that gives the sensation and impression of smoking, but does not emit the 4,000+ chemicals that combustion tobacco products produce.

The only chemical that enters the user’s system is nicotine, and the “smoke” produced that can be breathed in and out is actually water vapor.

“For some people, this may be a big help to get them to quit smoking,” Dr. Ordon says. “We don’t want to get people on nicotine; that’s not good, either [because it] constricts your blood vessels, but it’s a lot better than consuming all that tar and charcoal and carbon monoxide [that is in cigarettes].”

Dr. Ordon fails to mention, however, that cartridges are also available without nicotine if that’s what the customer prefers. And indeed, many users are also able to enjoy lower-density nicotine cartridges with the eventual goal of quitting the habit altogether.

Moreover, the doctors on the show seem to believe that e-cigs are only available in the UK and China, while in truth there are a number of U.S.-based companies offering a variety of products. Electronic cigarettes are not and have never been illegal, so it is unclear why many people seem to think they can’t get them stateside – most likely a result of FDA and Big Tobacco propaganda.

On the topic of the FDA, it is also mentioned on the show that electronic cigarettes haven’t yet been approved. While this is true, regular combustion cigarettes have never been and will never be FDA approved, either, so it’s something of a moot point. On top of that, all of the individual ingredients of e-cigs are FDA approved, the agency just hasn’t put the time and money into clinically testing the kits as a whole.

There are a couple of other misstatements and misleading information the doctors state within the show – such as starter kits will cost you $150 (much cheaper versions are widely available) – but all four of the hosts did try the e-cigs themselves and spoke with a smoker who also gave a positive review of the product.

It would have been nice if The Doctors more faithfully did their homework before airing incorrect information, but the exposure was a good start and a small step in the right direction toward the mainstream embrace of this excellent smoking alternative.

Posted in VideosComments (0)

Electronic Cigarettes On The Today Show


Ecigs On Today Show

Posted in VideosComments (0)

Dr. Vapor Re: The Rachel Ray Show


Dr. Vapor Discusses Rachel Ray

Posted in VideosComments (0)